(So those twits who show up in every discussion to badmouth specific settings can go ahead and **** off). There's really no such thing as a bad setting, so long as they're able to keep the emphasis on melee combat and parkour strong. I know ww2 is played out but it would be best in a MGS or AC game. Paris during the war, Berlin, anything from europe would work. I would want to see an eventual ww2 game.
Nepal with the Dhali Lama or Britian during the industrial revolution. Maybe India during British rule could work. Cool environments like Aztec/Egyptian pyraminds are cool but what else would there be? China has potential but all those Ninja games have done asian themes. Lastly there needs to be a good historical figure (ben frnaklin, washington, devinci exc). Pivotal moments in history (revolutionary war, crusades exc). Good distinct iconic buildings and landmarks (collusseum, vatican, eiffel tower, statue of liberty exc). I think they need to pick citys by a few things. Id like Moscow just for the distinct buildings not to mention the intersting history. Abraham Lincoln needs to be in a game but not next as it would feel too samey after the American Revolution. Much more interesting than another Revolution setting.Ĭivil War has to be done at some point. **EDIT** I'd say a much better setting than another Revolution setting would be Alexander The Great's Conquests. Mull it over and see where you went wrong. I know, I know, it's a radical concept, but it is real.
In it, people actually want to move forward from a game with a Revolution setting to a game that doesn't have another Revolution setting. You may not be able to conceive of such a place in your bland, boring, and repetitive inner worlds, but such a place does actually exist. Imagine a world where we didn't have to play games with obvious extended settings and themes. Opinions aren't going to kill you, they aren't going to try and rape your family members, and they can coexist in this vast world where everybody has one. I will forgo the personal attack route you've chosen to take and simply state that you should both learn to relax. The Napoleonic Wars might make for a good setting, as they are the most exciting aspect of that period, but by and large the French Revolution is just more of the same stuff from AC3.Īnd given that Assassin's Creed 3 has been slated as being the LAST of a trilogy, explain why there would be a sequel to the ending of a trilogy? Why there would be a need to continue an ended story? Exactly, there is no need.
I will instead point you in the direction of other historical revolutions that are FAR more interesting than the French Revolution and suggest you broaden your horizons beyond your own opinion. I'm not interested in giving you an in-depth history lesson on exactly what I know about the French Revolution (given that I am Canadian, spent most of my childhood education in bilingual schooling, and have had to learn about the period more than once) because it would serve no purpose to do so.
Anvil next ac3 series#
DragonKnight 3413d ago (Edited 3413d ago and Canary: Thank you for displaying your intelligence by assuming you know anything about a person online based on 5 words, as well as showing your knowledge about the Assassin's Creed series in general.
0 kommentar(er)
